lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 10:12:54 -0400
From:   Steven Rostedt <>
To:     Byungchul Park <>
Cc:     Hyeonggon Yoo <>,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v6 00/21] DEPT(Dependency Tracker)

On Tue, 10 May 2022 08:38:38 +0900
Byungchul Park <> wrote:

> Yes, I was talking about A and L'.
> > detect that regardless of L. A nested lock associates the the nesting with  
> When I checked Lockdep code, L' with depth n + 1 and L' with depth n
> have different classes in Lockdep.

If that's the case, then that's a bug in lockdep.

> That's why I said Lockdep cannot detect it. By any chance, has it
> changed so as to consider this case? Or am I missing something?

No, it's not that lockdep cannot detect it, it should detect it. If it is
not detecting it, then we need to fix that.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists