[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnyTOlV5p498bvPg@sol.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 21:55:22 -0700
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 10/10] f2fs: Move CONFIG_UNICODE defguards into the
code flow
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:31:46PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> @@ -293,10 +294,6 @@ static void f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache(void)
> {
> kmem_cache_destroy(f2fs_cf_name_slab);
> }
> -#else
> -static int __init f2fs_create_casefold_cache(void) { return 0; }
> -static void f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache(void) { }
> -#endif
[...]
> @@ -4611,7 +4608,10 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
> err = f2fs_init_compress_cache();
> if (err)
> goto free_compress_mempool;
> - err = f2fs_create_casefold_cache();
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE))
> + err = f2fs_create_casefold_cache();
> +
> if (err)
> goto free_compress_cache;
> return 0;
> @@ -4654,7 +4654,9 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
>
> static void __exit exit_f2fs_fs(void)
> {
> - f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache();
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNICODE))
> + f2fs_destroy_casefold_cache();
> +
I don't think the above two changes are actually an improvement. It's cleaner
to use stub functions to keep the callers simpler, as the original code did.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists