lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YoP5jH5axe9ltX2Y@mit.edu> Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 15:37:48 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com> Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, ebiggers@...nel.org, kernel@...labora.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/10] Clean up the case-insensitive lookup path On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 03:31:36PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote: > The case-insensitive implementations in f2fs and ext4 have quite a bit > of duplicated code. This series simplifies the ext4 version, with the > goal of extracting ext4_ci_compare into a helper library that can be > used by both filesystems. It also reduces the clutter from many > codeguards for CONFIG_UNICODE; as requested by Linus, they are part of > the codeflow now. > > While there, I noticed we can leverage the utf8 functions to detect > encoded names that are corrupted in the filesystem. Therefore, it also > adds an ext4 error on that scenario, to mark the filesystem as > corrupted. Gabriel, are you planning on doing another version of this patch series? It looks like the first two patches for ext4 are not controversial, so I could take those, while some of the other patches have questions which Eric has raised. Thanks, - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists