linux-ext4 - [PATCH] ext4: fix warning when submitting superblock in ext4_commit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220518141020.2432652-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 18 May 2022 22:10:20 +0800
From:   Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        <yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix warning when submitting superblock in ext4_commit_super()

We have already check the io_error and uptodate flag before submitting
the superblock buffer, and re-set the uptodate flag if it has been
failed to write out. But it was lockless and could be raced by another
ext4_commit_super(), and finally trigger '!uptodate' WARNING when
marking buffer dirty. Fix it by submit buffer directly.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 20 ++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 1466fbdbc8e3..cca0a87fe4ad 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -6002,7 +6002,6 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb)
 static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *sbh = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh;
-	int error = 0;
 
 	if (!sbh)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -6011,6 +6010,13 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	ext4_update_super(sb);
 
+	lock_buffer(sbh);
+	/* Buffer got discarded which means block device got invalidated */
+	if (!buffer_mapped(sbh)) {
+		unlock_buffer(sbh);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
 	if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh) || !buffer_uptodate(sbh)) {
 		/*
 		 * Oh, dear.  A previous attempt to write the
@@ -6025,17 +6031,19 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 		clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
 	}
-	BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
-	mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
-	error = __sync_dirty_buffer(sbh,
-		REQ_SYNC | (test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? REQ_FUA : 0));
+	get_bh(sbh);
+	sbh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
+	submit_bh(REQ_OP_WRITE,
+		  REQ_SYNC | (test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? REQ_FUA : 0), sbh);
+	wait_on_buffer(sbh);
 	if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "I/O error while writing "
 		       "superblock");
 		clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
+		return -EIO;
 	}
-	return error;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.31.1