lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 20 May 2022 10:32:16 +0800
From:   Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        <ritesh.list@...il.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: fix warning when submitting superblock in ext4_commit_super()

We have already check the io_error and uptodate flag before submitting
the superblock buffer, and re-set the uptodate flag if it has been
failed to write out. But it was lockless and could be raced by another
ext4_commit_super(), and finally trigger '!uptodate' WARNING when
marking buffer dirty. Fix it by submit buffer directly.

Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
v2->v1:
 - Add clear_buffer_dirty() before submit_bh().

 fs/ext4/super.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index 1466fbdbc8e3..9f6892665be4 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -6002,7 +6002,6 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb)
 static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	struct buffer_head *sbh = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_sbh;
-	int error = 0;
 
 	if (!sbh)
 		return -EINVAL;
@@ -6011,6 +6010,13 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 
 	ext4_update_super(sb);
 
+	lock_buffer(sbh);
+	/* Buffer got discarded which means block device got invalidated */
+	if (!buffer_mapped(sbh)) {
+		unlock_buffer(sbh);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
 	if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh) || !buffer_uptodate(sbh)) {
 		/*
 		 * Oh, dear.  A previous attempt to write the
@@ -6025,17 +6031,21 @@ static int ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb)
 		clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
 	}
-	BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
-	mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
-	error = __sync_dirty_buffer(sbh,
-		REQ_SYNC | (test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? REQ_FUA : 0));
+	get_bh(sbh);
+	/* Clear potential dirty bit if it was journalled update */
+	clear_buffer_dirty(sbh);
+	sbh->b_end_io = end_buffer_write_sync;
+	submit_bh(REQ_OP_WRITE,
+		  REQ_SYNC | (test_opt(sb, BARRIER) ? REQ_FUA : 0), sbh);
+	wait_on_buffer(sbh);
 	if (buffer_write_io_error(sbh)) {
 		ext4_msg(sb, KERN_ERR, "I/O error while writing "
 		       "superblock");
 		clear_buffer_write_io_error(sbh);
 		set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
+		return -EIO;
 	}
-	return error;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.31.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ