linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v2] ext4/053: update the test_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 3 Jun 2022 15:40:57 +0800
From:   Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ext4/053: update the test_dummy_encryption tests

On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 10:48:28PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 01:31:43PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> > On Mon, May 30, 2022 at 10:30:44AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > > From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > > 
> > > Kernel commit 5f41fdaea63d ("ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when
> > > supported") tightened the requirements on when the test_dummy_encryption
> > > mount option is accepted.  Update ext4/053 accordingly.
> > > 
> > > Move the test cases to later in the file to group them with the other
> > > test cases that use do_mkfs to add custom mkfs options instead of using
> > > the "default" filesystem that the test creates at the beginning.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > v2: mention the commit ID now that it is merged, and add a Reviewed-by
> > 
> > Hi Eric,
> > 
> > If I don't remember wrong, it was a patchset with 2 patches. Now you only
> > send this patch out, do you hope to merge this one only, or merge both?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Zorro
> > 
> 
> Just this one for now.  The second patch would add a test for the bug fix
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20220526040412.173025-1-ebiggers@kernel.org,
> but that wasn't applied for 5.19 due to a cross-tree dependency.  I'll be
> resending that test patch later.  One step at a time...

Sure, thanks for clarify that :)

Thanks,
Zorro

> 
> - Eric
>