linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 5.10] ext4: only allow test_dummy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 7 Jun 2022 11:54:46 +0200
From:   Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fscrypt@...r.kernel.org,
        Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>,
        Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10] ext4: only allow test_dummy_encryption when
 supported

On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:12:33PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> 
> commit 5f41fdaea63ddf96d921ab36b2af4a90ccdb5744 upstream.
> 
> Make the test_dummy_encryption mount option require that the encrypt
> feature flag be already enabled on the filesystem, rather than
> automatically enabling it.  Practically, this means that "-O encrypt"
> will need to be included in MKFS_OPTIONS when running xfstests with the
> test_dummy_encryption mount option.  (ext4/053 also needs an update.)
> 
> Moreover, as long as the preconditions for test_dummy_encryption are
> being tightened anyway, take the opportunity to start rejecting it when
> !CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION rather than ignoring it.
> 
> The motivation for requiring the encrypt feature flag is that:
> 
> - Having the filesystem auto-enable feature flags is problematic, as it
>   bypasses the usual sanity checks.  The specific issue which came up
>   recently is that in kernel versions where ext4 supports casefold but
>   not encrypt+casefold (v5.1 through v5.10), the kernel will happily add
>   the encrypt flag to a filesystem that has the casefold flag, making it
>   unmountable -- but only for subsequent mounts, not the initial one.
>   This confused the casefold support detection in xfstests, causing
>   generic/556 to fail rather than be skipped.
> 
> - The xfstests-bld test runners (kvm-xfstests et al.) already use the
>   required mkfs flag, so they will not be affected by this change.  Only
>   users of test_dummy_encryption alone will be affected.  But, this
>   option has always been for testing only, so it should be fine to
>   require that the few users of this option update their test scripts.
> 
> - f2fs already requires it (for its equivalent feature flag).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220519204437.61645-1-ebiggers@kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>

Both now queued up, thanks.

greg k-h