[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220629022940.2855538-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 10:29:40 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] ext4: check and assert if marking an no_delete evicting inode dirty
In ext4_evict_inode(), if we evicting an inode in the 'no_delete' path,
it cannot be raced by another mark_inode_dirty(). If it happens,
someone else may accidentally dirty it without holding inode refcount
and probably cause use-after-free issues in the writeback procedure.
It's indiscoverable and hard to debug, so add an ASSERT to check and
detect this issue in advance.
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 702cc208689a..2ba74412aa89 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -333,6 +333,12 @@ void ext4_evict_inode(struct inode *inode)
ext4_xattr_inode_array_free(ea_inode_array);
return;
no_delete:
+ /*
+ * Check out some where else accidentally dirty the evicting inode,
+ * which may probably cause inode use-after-free issues later.
+ */
+ ASSERT(list_empty_careful(&inode->i_io_list));
+
if (!list_empty(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_fc_list))
ext4_fc_mark_ineligible(inode->i_sb, EXT4_FC_REASON_NOMEM, NULL);
ext4_clear_inode(inode); /* We must guarantee clearing of inode... */
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists