lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 00:00:25 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Ext4 Developers List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>, stable@...nel.org Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: update s_overhead_clusters in the superblock during an on-line resize When doing an online resize, the on-disk superblock on-disk wasn't updated. This means that when the file system is unmounted and remounted, and the on-disk overhead value is non-zero, this would result in the results of statfs(2) to be incorrect. This was partially fixed by Commits 10b01ee92df5 ("ext4: fix overhead calculation to account for the reserved gdt blocks"), 85d825dbf489 ("ext4: force overhead calculation if the s_overhead_cluster makes no sense"), and eb7054212eac ("ext4: update the cached overhead value in the superblock"). However, since it was too expensive to forcibly recalculate the overhead for bigalloc file systems at every mount, this didn't fix the problem for bigalloc file systems. This commit should address the problem when resizing file systems with the bigalloc feature enabled. Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> Cc: stable@...nel.org --- fs/ext4/resize.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/fs/ext4/resize.c b/fs/ext4/resize.c index 8b70a4701293..e5c2713aa11a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/resize.c +++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ static void ext4_update_super(struct super_block *sb, * Update the fs overhead information */ ext4_calculate_overhead(sb); + es->s_overhead_clusters = cpu_to_le32(sbi->s_overhead); if (test_opt(sb, DEBUG)) printk(KERN_DEBUG "EXT4-fs: added group %u:" -- 2.31.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists