linux-ext4 - Re: should we make "-o iversion" the default on ext4 ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BAFC8295-B629-49DB-A381-DD592182055D@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 20 Jul 2022 11:56:12 -0400
From:   "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@...hat.com>
To:     "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc:     "Lukas Czerner" <lczerner@...hat.com>, tytso@....edu,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: should we make "-o iversion" the default on ext4 ?

On 20 Jul 2022, at 10:38, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-07-20 at 16:15 +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote:
>>
>> Is there a different way I am not seeing?
>>
>
> Right, implementing this is the difficult bit actually since this uses a
> MS_* flag. If we do make this the default, we'd definitely want to
> continue allowing "-o noiversion" to disable it.
>
> Could we just reverse the default in libmount? It might cause this to
> suddenly be enabled in some deployments, but in most cases, people
> wouldn't even notice and they could still specify -o noiversion to turn
> it off.
>
> Another idea would be to introduce new mount options for this, but
> that's kind of nasty from a UI standpoint.

Is it safe to set SB_I_VERSION at export time?  If so, export_operations
could grow an ->enable_iversion().

Ben