lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:36:59 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> To: Zorro Lang <zlang@...hat.com> Cc: Sun Ke <sunke32@...wei.com>, fstests@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ext4: resize fs after resize_inode without e2fsck On Fri, Jul 22, 2022 at 11:11:14PM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote: > > This resets the s_reserved_gdt_blocks field back to zero, so the fsck > > doesn't fail. Which is fine, because the point of the test is to see > > whether the kernel dereferences a NULL pointer or not. > > Or maybe just replace _reuqire_scratch with _require_scratch_nocheck, if we > corrupt the fs on SCRATCH_DEV intentionally? Agreed, that would be a better solution. - Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists