lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YuNcd7q6a33tqkAf@sol.localdomain> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 21:05:11 -0700 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, jlayton@...nel.org, tytso@....edu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] fs: record I_DIRTY_TIME even if inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 03:39:14PM +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Currently the I_DIRTY_TIME will never get set if the inode already has > I_DIRTY_INODE with assumption that it supersedes I_DIRTY_TIME. That's > true, however ext4 will only update the on-disk inode in > ->dirty_inode(), not on actual writeback. As a result if the inode > already has I_DIRTY_INODE state by the time we get to > __mark_inode_dirty() only with I_DIRTY_TIME, the time was already filled > into on-disk inode and will not get updated until the next I_DIRTY_INODE > update, which might never come if we crash or get a power failure. > > The problem can be reproduced on ext4 by running xfstest generic/622 > with -o iversion mount option. Fix it by setting I_DIRTY_TIME even if > the inode already has I_DIRTY_INODE. > > Also clear the I_DIRTY_TIME after ->dirty_inode() otherwise it may never > get cleared. > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> If you're going to change the meaning of I_* flags, please update the comment in include/linux/fs.h that describes what they mean. - Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists