lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 08 Aug 2022 00:34:45 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+79e6bbabf3ce17357969@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     jack@...e.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        tytso@....edu
Subject: [syzbot] possible deadlock in jbd2_journal_lock_updates

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    ca688bff68bc Add linux-next specific files for 20220808
git tree:       linux-next
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1228affe080000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=4c20e006003cdecb
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=79e6bbabf3ce17357969
compiler:       gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+79e6bbabf3ce17357969@...kaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.2/10446 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88807feb0170 (&journal->j_barrier){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0x15e/0x310 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:904

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88807ff5ebd8 (&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem){++++}-{0:0}, at: ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0x178/0x530 fs/ext4/inode.c:6013

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem){++++}-{0:0}:
       percpu_down_write+0x4d/0x440 kernel/locking/percpu-rwsem.c:221
       ext4_ind_migrate+0x237/0x840 fs/ext4/migrate.c:624
       ext4_ioctl_setflags fs/ext4/ioctl.c:694 [inline]
       ext4_fileattr_set+0x14b8/0x1930 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1001
       vfs_fileattr_set+0x7f5/0xbe0 fs/ioctl.c:696
       ioctl_fssetxattr fs/ioctl.c:758 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0xe62/0x15c0 fs/ioctl.c:845
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x108/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #2 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}:
       down_read+0x98/0x450 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1499
       inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:771 [inline]
       ext4_bmap+0x4e/0x460 fs/ext4/inode.c:3157
       bmap+0xaa/0x120 fs/inode.c:1799
       jbd2_journal_bmap+0xa8/0x180 fs/jbd2/journal.c:971
       __jbd2_journal_erase fs/jbd2/journal.c:1784 [inline]
       jbd2_journal_flush+0x84f/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2490
       ext4_ioctl_checkpoint fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1082 [inline]
       __ext4_ioctl+0x28fd/0x4ab0 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1586
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (&journal->j_checkpoint_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       mutex_lock_io_nested+0x13f/0x1190 kernel/locking/mutex.c:833
       jbd2_journal_flush+0x19a/0xc00 fs/jbd2/journal.c:2462
       ext4_ioctl_checkpoint fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1082 [inline]
       __ext4_ioctl+0x28fd/0x4ab0 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1586
       vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&journal->j_barrier){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
       lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
       lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0x15e/0x310 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:904
       ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0x180/0x530 fs/ext4/inode.c:6014
       ext4_ioctl_setflags fs/ext4/ioctl.c:685 [inline]
       ext4_fileattr_set+0xddf/0x1930 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1001
       vfs_fileattr_set+0x7f5/0xbe0 fs/ioctl.c:696
       ioctl_fssetxattr fs/ioctl.c:758 [inline]
       do_vfs_ioctl+0xe62/0x15c0 fs/ioctl.c:845
       __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
       __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
       __x64_sys_ioctl+0x108/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &journal->j_barrier --> &sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8 --> &sbi->s_writepages_rwsem

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  lock(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem);
                               lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8);
                               lock(&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem);
  lock(&journal->j_barrier);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

4 locks held by syz-executor.2/10446:
 #0: ffff88807ff5c460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: ioctl_setflags fs/ioctl.c:725 [inline]
 #0: ffff88807ff5c460 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_vfs_ioctl+0xe27/0x15c0 fs/ioctl.c:839
 #1: ffff88802b44de48 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:761 [inline]
 #1: ffff88802b44de48 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#8){++++}-{3:3}, at: vfs_fileattr_set+0x148/0xbe0 fs/ioctl.c:681
 #2: ffff88802b44dfe8 (mapping.invalidate_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: filemap_invalidate_lock include/linux/fs.h:806 [inline]
 #2: ffff88802b44dfe8 (mapping.invalidate_lock){++++}-{3:3}, at: ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0x11f/0x530 fs/ext4/inode.c:6005
 #3: ffff88807ff5ebd8 (&sbi->s_writepages_rwsem){++++}-{0:0}, at: ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0x178/0x530 fs/ext4/inode.c:6013

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 10446 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 5.19.0-next-20220808-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/22/2022
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0xcd/0x134 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x25f/0x2e0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2175
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3095 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3214 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3829 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x2a43/0x56d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5053
 lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5666 [inline]
 lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x570 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5631
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x12f/0x1350 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
 jbd2_journal_lock_updates+0x15e/0x310 fs/jbd2/transaction.c:904
 ext4_change_inode_journal_flag+0x180/0x530 fs/ext4/inode.c:6014
 ext4_ioctl_setflags fs/ext4/ioctl.c:685 [inline]
 ext4_fileattr_set+0xddf/0x1930 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1001
 vfs_fileattr_set+0x7f5/0xbe0 fs/ioctl.c:696
 ioctl_fssetxattr fs/ioctl.c:758 [inline]
 do_vfs_ioctl+0xe62/0x15c0 fs/ioctl.c:845
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:868 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x108/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:856
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7f2195489279
Code: ff ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b8 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007f219651b168 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f219559bf80 RCX: 00007f2195489279
RDX: 0000000020000380 RSI: 0000000040086602 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007f21954e3189 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 00007ffd08022a2f R14: 00007f219651b300 R15: 0000000000022000
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists