lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2022 14:42:36 -0400 From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> To: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org Cc: tytso@....edu, jack@...e.cz, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, ebiggers@...nel.org, david@...morbit.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] ext4: don't increase iversion counter for ea_inodes On Fri, 2022-08-12 at 14:37 +0200, Lukas Czerner wrote: > ea_inodes are using i_version for storing part of the reference count so > we really need to leave it alone. > > The problem can be reproduced by xfstest ext4/026 when iversion is > enabled. Fix it by not calling inode_inc_iversion() for EXT4_EA_INODE_FL > inodes in ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(). > > Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com> > Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> > --- > v2, v3: no change > > fs/ext4/inode.c | 7 ++++++- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 601214453c3a..2a220be34caa 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -5731,7 +5731,12 @@ int ext4_mark_iloc_dirty(handle_t *handle, > } > ext4_fc_track_inode(handle, inode); > > - if (IS_I_VERSION(inode)) > + /* > + * ea_inodes are using i_version for storing reference count, don't > + * mess with it > + */ > + if (IS_I_VERSION(inode) && > + !(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EA_INODE_FL)) > inode_inc_iversion(inode); > > /* the do_update_inode consumes one bh->b_count */ I've spent some time writing tests for the i_version counter (still quite rough right now), and what I've found is that this particular inode_inc_iversion results in the counter being bumped on _reads_ as well as writes, due to the atime changing. This call to inode_inc_iversion seems to make no sense, as we aren't bumping the mtime here. I'm still working on and testing this, but I think we'll probably just want to remove this inode_inc_iversion entirely, and leave the i_version bumping for normal files to happen when the timestamps are updated. So far, my testing seems to indicate that that does the right thing. Hopefully I'll have some testcases + patches for this next week sometime. Cheers, -- Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists