[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220901133505.2510834-8-yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 21:34:58 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
To: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <cluster-devel@...hat.com>,
<ntfs3@...ts.linux.dev>, <ocfs2-devel@....oracle.com>,
<reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org>, <jack@...e.cz>
CC: <tytso@....edu>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
<viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, <rpeterso@...hat.com>,
<agruenba@...hat.com>, <almaz.alexandrovich@...agon-software.com>,
<mark@...heh.com>, <dushistov@...l.ru>, <hch@...radead.org>,
<yi.zhang@...wei.com>, <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
<yukuai3@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/14] ntfs3: replace ll_rw_block()
ll_rw_block() is not safe for the sync read path because it cannot
guarantee that submitting read IO if the buffer has been locked. We
could get false positive EIO after wait_on_buffer() if the buffer has
been locked by others. So stop using ll_rw_block() in
ntfs_get_block_vbo().
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
fs/ntfs3/inode.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
index 51363d4e8636..cadbfa111539 100644
--- a/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ntfs3/inode.c
@@ -630,12 +630,9 @@ static noinline int ntfs_get_block_vbo(struct inode *inode, u64 vbo,
bh->b_size = block_size;
off = vbo & (PAGE_SIZE - 1);
set_bh_page(bh, page, off);
- ll_rw_block(REQ_OP_READ, 1, &bh);
- wait_on_buffer(bh);
- if (!buffer_uptodate(bh)) {
- err = -EIO;
+ err = bh_read(bh, 0);
+ if (err < 0)
goto out;
- }
zero_user_segment(page, off + voff, off + block_size);
}
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists