[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220908091332.lowhekyxcs23kgtu@riteshh-domain>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 14:43:32 +0530
From: "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To: Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov@...il.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@...ger.ca>,
Artem Blagodarenko <artem.blagodarenko@...il.com>,
Andrew Perepechko <anserper@...ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jbd2: wake up journal waiters in FIFO order, not LIFO
On 22/09/08 11:16AM, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> On 22/09/07 07:59PM, Alexey Lyashkov wrote:
> > From: Andrew Perepechko <anserper@...ru>
> >
> > LIFO wakeup order is unfair and sometimes leads to a journal
> > user not being able to get a journal handle for hundreds of
> > transactions in a row.
> >
> > FIFO wakeup can make things more fair.
>
> prepare_to_wait() will always add the task to the head of the list.
> While prepare_to_wait_exclusive() will add the task to the tail since all of the
> exclusive tasks are added to the tail.
> wake_up() function will wake up all non-exclusive and single exclusive task
> v/s
> wake_up_all() function will wake up all tasks irrespective.
>
> So your change does makes the ordering to FIFO, in which the task which came in
> first will be woken up first.
With all other details which got discussed in other threads.
This looks like the right thing to do.
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists