[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220908113354.uikvfzlv7sn4a6iw@quack3>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2022 13:33:54 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: kbuild@...ts.01.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>, lkp@...el.com,
kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ext4: Use buckets for cr 1 block scan instead of
rbtree
On Thu 08-09-22 14:00:17, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
>
> url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/ext4-Fix-performance-regression-with-mballoc/20220907-000945
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 53e99dcff61e1523ec1c3628b2d564ba15d32eb7
> config: m68k-randconfig-m041-20220906 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220907/202209071206.u1iHKVzB-lkp@intel.com/config)
> compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 12.1.0
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> New smatch warnings:
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c:945 ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1() error: uninitialized symbol 'grp'.
>
> vim +/grp +945 fs/ext4/mballoc.c
>
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 909 static void ext4_mb_choose_next_group_cr1(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 910 int *new_cr, ext4_group_t *group, ext4_group_t ngroups)
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 911 {
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 912 struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 913 struct ext4_group_info *grp, *iter;
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 914 int i;
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 915
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 916 if (unlikely(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_CR1_OPTIMIZED)) {
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 917 if (sbi->s_mb_stats)
> 196e402adf2e4c Harshad Shirwadkar 2021-04-01 918 atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_cr1_bad_suggestions);
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 919 }
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 920
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 921 for (i = mb_avg_fragment_size_order(ac->ac_sb, ac->ac_g_ex.fe_len);
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 922 i < MB_NUM_ORDERS(ac->ac_sb); i++) {
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 923 if (list_empty(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i]))
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 924 continue;
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 925 read_lock(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size_locks[i]);
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 926 if (list_empty(&sbi->s_mb_avg_fragment_size[i])) {
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 927 read_unlock(&sbi->s_mb_largest_free_orders_locks[i]);
> 31b571b608cf66 Jan Kara 2022-09-06 928 continue;
>
> Smatch worries that we can hit these two continues on every iteration.
> Why not just initialize "grp = NULL;" at the start of the function?
Yes, good point. It may even be possible in some rare racy cornercase. I'll
do what you suggest. Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists