[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3353084-264c-859a-3b42-a98e29f039cf@leemhuis.info>
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2022 11:55:05 +0200
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: hazem ahmed mohamed <hazem.ahmed.abuelfotoh@...il.com>,
"linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
"adilger.kernel@...ger.ca" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mohamed Abuelfotoh, Hazem" <abuehaze@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: Ext4: Buffered random writes performance regression with
dioread_nolock enabled
On 21.09.22 04:41, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> Hazem started separate e-mail threads on this issue (separated by
> about an hour), and I replied to the earlier one here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yypx6VQRbl3bFP2v@mit.edu/
#regbot monitor: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yypx6VQRbl3bFP2v@mit.edu/
> TL;DR:
>
> 1) The patch landed in 5.6, and improved performance for some
> workloads, and also fixed a potential security problem (exposure of
> stale data caused by a race).
>
> 2) If you are using a storage device >= 128GB, and a version of
> e2fsprogs v1.43.2 (released six years ago), the journal size will be
> 1GB, which Hazem reported resolved the problem.
>
> 3) I disagree that we should revert this commit, as it only changes a
> default. If you prefer the older behavior, you can change it with a
> mount option.
Great, thx for clarifying, in that case let me remove this from the
tracking:
#regzbot invalid: caused by a change of defaults that (among others) was
done for security reasons, see Ted's answer in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/Yypx6VQRbl3bFP2v@mit.edu/ for details
Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists