| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 14:46:45 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, rookxu <brookxu.cn@...il.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC v3 5/8] ext4: Abstract out overlap fix/check logic in ext4_mb_normalize_request()
Abstract out the logic of fixing PA overlaps in ext4_mb_normalize_request to
improve readability of code. This also makes it easier to make changes
to the overlap logic in future.
There are no functional changes in this patch
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
---
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index d1ce34888dcc..dda9a72c81d9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -4008,6 +4008,74 @@ ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
rcu_read_unlock();
}
+/*
+ * Given an allocation context "ac" and a range "start", "end", check
+ * and adjust boundaries if the range overlaps with any of the existing
+ * preallocatoins stored in the corresponding inode of the allocation context.
+ *
+ *Parameters:
+ * ac allocation context
+ * start start of the new range
+ * end end of the new range
+ */
+static inline void
+ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
+ ext4_lblk_t *start, ext4_lblk_t *end)
+{
+ struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
+ struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(ac->ac_sb);
+ struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
+ ext4_lblk_t new_start, new_end;
+ ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
+
+ new_start = *start;
+ new_end = *end;
+
+ /* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted)
+ continue;
+ spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) {
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
+ tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
+
+ /* PA must not overlap original request */
+ BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end ||
+ ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start));
+
+ /* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */
+ if (tmp_pa_start >= new_end || tmp_pa_end <= new_start) {
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start <= new_start && tmp_pa_end >= new_end);
+
+ /* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */
+ if (tmp_pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_end < new_start);
+ new_start = tmp_pa_end;
+ } else if (tmp_pa_start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
+ BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start > new_end);
+ new_end = tmp_pa_start;
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ /* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
+ ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, new_start, new_end);
+
+ *start = new_start;
+ *end = new_end;
+ return;
+}
+
/*
* Normalization means making request better in terms of
* size and alignment
@@ -4022,9 +4090,6 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
loff_t size, start_off;
loff_t orig_size __maybe_unused;
ext4_lblk_t start;
- struct ext4_inode_info *ei = EXT4_I(ac->ac_inode);
- struct ext4_prealloc_space *tmp_pa;
- ext4_lblk_t tmp_pa_start, tmp_pa_end;
/* do normalize only data requests, metadata requests
do not need preallocation */
@@ -4125,47 +4190,10 @@ ext4_mb_normalize_request(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
end = start + size;
- /* check we don't cross already preallocated blocks */
- rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp_pa, &ei->i_prealloc_list, pa_inode_list) {
- if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted)
- continue;
- spin_lock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
- if (tmp_pa->pa_deleted) {
- spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
- continue;
- }
-
- tmp_pa_start = tmp_pa->pa_lstart;
- tmp_pa_end = tmp_pa->pa_lstart + EXT4_C2B(sbi, tmp_pa->pa_len);
-
- /* PA must not overlap original request */
- BUG_ON(!(ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical >= tmp_pa_end ||
- ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical < tmp_pa_start));
-
- /* skip PAs this normalized request doesn't overlap with */
- if (tmp_pa_start >= end || tmp_pa_end <= start) {
- spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
- continue;
- }
- BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start <= start && tmp_pa_end >= end);
+ ext4_mb_pa_adjust_overlap(ac, &start, &end);
- /* adjust start or end to be adjacent to this pa */
- if (tmp_pa_end <= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
- BUG_ON(tmp_pa_end < start);
- start = tmp_pa_end;
- } else if (tmp_pa_start > ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical) {
- BUG_ON(tmp_pa_start > end);
- end = tmp_pa_start;
- }
- spin_unlock(&tmp_pa->pa_lock);
- }
- rcu_read_unlock();
size = end - start;
- /* XXX: extra loop to check we really don't overlap preallocations */
- ext4_mb_pa_assert_overlap(ac, start, end);
-
/*
* In this function "start" and "size" are normalized for better
* alignment and length such that we could preallocate more blocks.
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists