[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yz7U99PPl8uHCLFY@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 10:15:35 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
cake@...ts.bufferbloat.net, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, dccp@...r.kernel.org, dev@...nvswitch.org,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
linux-actions@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hams@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, rds-devel@....oracle.com,
SHA-cyfmac-dev-list@...ineon.com, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
tipc-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] treewide: use get_random_u32() when possible
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:05:48AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
> > > index fd9d7f2c4d64..a605cf66b83e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_cm.c
> > > @@ -465,7 +465,7 @@ static int ipoib_cm_req_handler(struct ib_cm_id *cm_id,
> > > goto err_qp;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - psn = prandom_u32() & 0xffffff;
> > > + psn = get_random_u32() & 0xffffff;
> >
> > prandom_max(0xffffff + 1)
>
> That'd work, but again it's not more clear. Authors here are going for
> a 24-bit number, and masking seems like a clear way to express that.
vs just asking directly for a 24 bit number?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists