linux-ext4 - [PATCH -next] ext4: fix warning in 'ext4_da_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20221018012416.373869-1-yebin10@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:24:16 +0800
From:   Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
To:     <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>,
        <syzbot+c740bb18df70ad00952e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] ext4: fix warning in 'ext4_da_release_space'

Syzkaller report issue as follows:
EXT4-fs (loop0): Free/Dirty block details
EXT4-fs (loop0): free_blocks=0
EXT4-fs (loop0): dirty_blocks=0
EXT4-fs (loop0): Block reservation details
EXT4-fs (loop0): i_reserved_data_blocks=0
EXT4-fs warning (device loop0): ext4_da_release_space:1527: ext4_da_release_space: ino 18, to_free 1 with only 0 reserved data blocks
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 92 at fs/ext4/inode.c:1528 ext4_da_release_space+0x25e/0x370 fs/ext4/inode.c:1524
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 92 Comm: kworker/u4:4 Not tainted 6.0.0-syzkaller-09423-g493ffd6605b2 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 09/22/2022
Workqueue: writeback wb_workfn (flush-7:0)
RIP: 0010:ext4_da_release_space+0x25e/0x370 fs/ext4/inode.c:1528
RSP: 0018:ffffc900015f6c90 EFLAGS: 00010296
RAX: 42215896cd52ea00 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 42215896cd52ea00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000080000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
RBP: 1ffff1100e907d96 R08: ffffffff816aa79d R09: fffff520002bece5
R10: fffff520002bece5 R11: 1ffff920002bece4 R12: ffff888021fd2000
R13: ffff88807483ecb0 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff88807483e740
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00005555569ba628 CR3: 000000000c88e000 CR4: 00000000003506f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ext4_es_remove_extent+0x1ab/0x260 fs/ext4/extents_status.c:1461
 mpage_release_unused_pages+0x24d/0xef0 fs/ext4/inode.c:1589
 ext4_writepages+0x12eb/0x3be0 fs/ext4/inode.c:2852
 do_writepages+0x3c3/0x680 mm/page-writeback.c:2469
 __writeback_single_inode+0xd1/0x670 fs/fs-writeback.c:1587
 writeback_sb_inodes+0xb3b/0x18f0 fs/fs-writeback.c:1870
 wb_writeback+0x41f/0x7b0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2044
 wb_do_writeback fs/fs-writeback.c:2187 [inline]
 wb_workfn+0x3cb/0xef0 fs/fs-writeback.c:2227
 process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
 worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
 kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:306
 </TASK>

Above issue may happens as follows:
ext4_da_write_begin
  ext4_create_inline_data
    ext4_clear_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS);
    ext4_set_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA);
__ext4_ioctl
  ext4_ext_migrate -> will lead to eh->eh_entries not zero, and set extent flag
ext4_da_write_begin
  ext4_da_convert_inline_data_to_extent
    ext4_da_write_inline_data_begin
      ext4_da_map_blocks
        ext4_insert_delayed_block
	  if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode, &ext4_es_is_delonly, lblk))
	    if (!ext4_es_scan_clu(inode, &ext4_es_is_mapped, lblk))
	      ext4_clu_mapped(inode, EXT4_B2C(sbi, lblk)); -> will return 1
	       allocated = true;
          ext4_es_insert_delayed_block(inode, lblk, allocated);
ext4_writepages
  mpage_map_and_submit_extent(handle, &mpd, &give_up_on_write); -> return -ENOSPC
  mpage_release_unused_pages(&mpd, give_up_on_write); -> give_up_on_write == 1
    ext4_es_remove_extent
      ext4_da_release_space(inode, reserved);
        if (unlikely(to_free > ei->i_reserved_data_blocks))
	  -> to_free == 1  but ei->i_reserved_data_blocks == 0
	  -> then trigger warning as above

To solve above issue, forbid inode do migrate which has inline data.

Reported-by: syzbot+c740bb18df70ad00952e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/migrate.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/migrate.c b/fs/ext4/migrate.c
index 0a220ec9862d..1c2e998f3256 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/migrate.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/migrate.c
@@ -424,7 +424,8 @@ int ext4_ext_migrate(struct inode *inode)
 	 * already is extent-based, error out.
 	 */
 	if (!ext4_has_feature_extents(inode->i_sb) ||
-	    (ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS)))
+	    ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_EXTENTS) ||
+	    ext4_test_inode_flag(inode, EXT4_INODE_INLINE_DATA))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode) && inode->i_blocks == 0)
-- 
2.31.1