[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf9dba6f-50c6-5ba8-31e3-b60de18105f1@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:29:34 +0800
From: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>, <tytso@....edu>,
<adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: make ext4_mb_initialize_context return void
On 2022/10/27 11:24, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
> Change the return type to void since it always return 0, and no need
> to do the checking in ext4_mb_new_blocks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>
> ---
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 10 ++--------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 9dad93059945..5b2ae37a8b80 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -5204,7 +5204,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_group_or_file(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> mutex_lock(&ac->ac_lg->lg_mutex);
> }
>
> -static noinline_for_stack int
> +static noinline_for_stack void
> ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> struct ext4_allocation_request *ar)
> {
> @@ -5253,8 +5253,6 @@ ext4_mb_initialize_context(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> (unsigned) ar->lleft, (unsigned) ar->pleft,
> (unsigned) ar->lright, (unsigned) ar->pright,
> inode_is_open_for_write(ar->inode) ? "" : "non-");
> - return 0;
> -
> }
>
> static noinline_for_stack void
> @@ -5591,11 +5589,7 @@ ext4_fsblk_t ext4_mb_new_blocks(handle_t *handle,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - *errp = ext4_mb_initialize_context(ac, ar);
> - if (*errp) {
> - ar->len = 0;
> - goto out;
> - }
> + ext4_mb_initialize_context(ac, ar);
This changed the logic here slightly. *errp will not be intialized with
zero after this change. So we need to carefully check whether this will
cause any issues.
Thanks,
Jason
>
> ac->ac_op = EXT4_MB_HISTORY_PREALLOC;
> seq = this_cpu_read(discard_pa_seq);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists