lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <b06d87088940bddfe0864a2b927c9b0482c6b792.1667822611.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon,  7 Nov 2022 17:51:21 +0530
From:   "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
        Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>,
        Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        Li Xi <lixi@....com>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [RFCv1 33/72] e2fsck: optimize the inserting of dir_info_db

From: Li Xi <lixi@....com>

Binary search is now used when inserting an dir info to the array.
Memmove is now used when moving array. Both of them improves
the performance of inserting.

This patch is also a prepartion for the merging of two dir db
arrays.

Signed-off-by: Li Xi <lixi@....com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
---
 e2fsck/dirinfo.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 112 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)

diff --git a/e2fsck/dirinfo.c b/e2fsck/dirinfo.c
index 49d624c5..5c360a90 100644
--- a/e2fsck/dirinfo.c
+++ b/e2fsck/dirinfo.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 
 #undef DIRINFO_DEBUG
 
+#include <assert.h>
 #include "config.h"
 #include "e2fsck.h"
 #include <sys/stat.h>
@@ -122,6 +123,104 @@ static void setup_db(e2fsck_t ctx)
 				       "directory map");
 }
 
+/*
+ * Return the min index that has ino larger or equal to @ino
+ * If not found, return -ENOENT
+ */
+static int
+e2fsck_dir_info_min_larger_equal(struct dir_info_db *dir_info,
+				 ext2_ino_t ino, ext2_ino_t *index)
+{
+	ext2_ino_t low = 0;
+	ext2_ino_t mid, high;
+	ext2_ino_t tmp_ino;
+	int found = 0;
+
+	if (dir_info->count == 0)
+		return -ENOENT;
+
+	high = dir_info->count - 1;
+	while (low <= high) {
+		/* sum may overflow, but result will fit into mid again */
+		mid = (unsigned long long)(low + high) / 2;
+		tmp_ino = dir_info->array[mid].ino;
+		if (ino == tmp_ino) {
+			*index = mid;
+			found = 1;
+			return 0;
+		} else if (ino < tmp_ino) {
+			/*
+			 * The mid ino is larger than @ino, remember the index
+			 * here so we won't miss this ino
+			 */
+			*index = mid;
+			found = 1;
+			if (mid == 0)
+				break;
+			high = mid - 1;
+		} else {
+			low = mid + 1;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (found)
+		return 0;
+
+	return -ENOENT;
+}
+
+/*
+ *
+ * Insert an inode into the sorted array. The array should have at least one
+ * free slot.
+ *
+ * Normally, add_dir_info is called with each inode in
+ * sequential order; but once in a while (like when pass 3
+ * needs to recreate the root directory or lost+found
+ * directory) it is called out of order.  In those cases, we
+ * need to move the dir_info entries down to make room, since
+ * the dir_info array needs to be sorted by inode number for
+ * get_dir_info()'s sake.
+ */
+static void e2fsck_insert_dir_info(struct dir_info_db *dir_info, ext2_ino_t ino, ext2_ino_t parent)
+{
+	ext2_ino_t index;
+	struct dir_info *dir;
+	size_t dir_size = sizeof(*dir);
+	struct dir_info *array = dir_info->array;
+	ext2_ino_t array_count = dir_info->count;
+	int err;
+
+	/*
+	 * Removing this check won't break anything. But since seqential ino
+	 * inserting happens a lot, this check avoids binary search.
+	 */
+	if (array_count == 0 || array[array_count - 1].ino < ino) {
+		dir = &array[array_count];
+		dir_info->count++;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	err = e2fsck_dir_info_min_larger_equal(dir_info, ino, &index);
+	if (err >= 0 && array[index].ino == ino) {
+		dir = &array[index];
+		goto out;
+	}
+	if (err < 0) {
+		dir = &array[array_count];
+		dir_info->count++;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	dir = &array[index];
+	memmove((char *)dir + dir_size, dir, dir_size * (array_count - index));
+	dir_info->count++;
+out:
+	dir->ino = ino;
+	dir->dotdot = parent;
+	dir->parent = parent;
+}
+
 /*
  * This subroutine is called during pass1 to create a directory info
  * entry.  During pass1, the passed-in parent is 0; it will get filled
@@ -171,30 +270,7 @@ void e2fsck_add_dir_info(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino, ext2_ino_t parent)
 	}
 #endif
 
-	/*
-	 * Normally, add_dir_info is called with each inode in
-	 * sequential order; but once in a while (like when pass 3
-	 * needs to recreate the root directory or lost+found
-	 * directory) it is called out of order.  In those cases, we
-	 * need to move the dir_info entries down to make room, since
-	 * the dir_info array needs to be sorted by inode number for
-	 * get_dir_info()'s sake.
-	 */
-	if (ctx->dir_info->count &&
-	    ctx->dir_info->array[ctx->dir_info->count-1].ino >= ino) {
-		for (i = ctx->dir_info->count-1; i > 0; i--)
-			if (ctx->dir_info->array[i-1].ino < ino)
-				break;
-		dir = &ctx->dir_info->array[i];
-		if (dir->ino != ino)
-			for (j = ctx->dir_info->count++; j > i; j--)
-				ctx->dir_info->array[j] = ctx->dir_info->array[j-1];
-	} else
-		dir = &ctx->dir_info->array[ctx->dir_info->count++];
-
-	dir->ino = ino;
-	dir->dotdot = parent;
-	dir->parent = parent;
+	e2fsck_insert_dir_info(ctx->dir_info, ino, parent);
 }
 
 /*
@@ -204,7 +280,8 @@ void e2fsck_add_dir_info(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino, ext2_ino_t parent)
 static struct dir_info *e2fsck_get_dir_info(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino)
 {
 	struct dir_info_db	*db = ctx->dir_info;
-	ext2_ino_t low, high, mid;
+	ext2_ino_t		index;
+	int			err;
 
 	if (!db)
 		return 0;
@@ -245,44 +322,19 @@ static struct dir_info *e2fsck_get_dir_info(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t ino)
 	if (db->last_lookup && db->last_lookup->ino == ino)
 		return db->last_lookup;
 
-	low = 0;
-	high = ctx->dir_info->count - 1;
-	if (ino == ctx->dir_info->array[low].ino) {
+	err = e2fsck_dir_info_min_larger_equal(ctx->dir_info, ino, &index);
+	if (err < 0)
+		return NULL;
+	assert(ino <= ctx->dir_info->array[index].ino);
+	if (ino == ctx->dir_info->array[index].ino) {
 #ifdef DIRINFO_DEBUG
-		printf("(%u,%u,%u)\n", ino,
-		       ctx->dir_info->array[low].dotdot,
-		       ctx->dir_info->array[low].parent);
+		printf("(%d,%d,%d)\n", ino,
+		       ctx->dir_info->array[index].dotdot,
+		       ctx->dir_info->array[index].parent);
 #endif
-		return &ctx->dir_info->array[low];
+		return &ctx->dir_info->array[index];
 	}
-	if (ino == ctx->dir_info->array[high].ino) {
-#ifdef DIRINFO_DEBUG
-		printf("(%u,%u,%u)\n", ino,
-		       ctx->dir_info->array[high].dotdot,
-		       ctx->dir_info->array[high].parent);
-#endif
-		return &ctx->dir_info->array[high];
-	}
-
-	while (low < high) {
-		/* sum may overflow, but result will fit into mid again */
-		mid = (unsigned long long)(low + high) / 2;
-		if (mid == low || mid == high)
-			break;
-		if (ino == ctx->dir_info->array[mid].ino) {
-#ifdef DIRINFO_DEBUG
-			printf("(%u,%u,%u)\n", ino,
-			       ctx->dir_info->array[mid].dotdot,
-			       ctx->dir_info->array[mid].parent);
-#endif
-			return &ctx->dir_info->array[mid];
-		}
-		if (ino < ctx->dir_info->array[mid].ino)
-			high = mid;
-		else
-			low = mid;
-	}
-	return 0;
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static void e2fsck_put_dir_info(e2fsck_t ctx EXT2FS_NO_TDB_UNUSED,
-- 
2.37.3

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ