[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20221113162902.883850-8-hch@lst.de>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2022 17:29:00 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...nel.org>,
Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>,
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp>,
Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@...ax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
Bob Copeland <me@...copeland.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-karma-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: [PATCH 7/9] jfs: remove ->writepage
->writepage is a very inefficient method to write back data, and only
used through write_cache_pages or a a fallback when no ->migrate_folio
method is present.
Set ->migrate_folio to the generic buffer_head based helper, and remove
the ->writepage implementation.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
fs/jfs/inode.c | 7 +------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/inode.c b/fs/jfs/inode.c
index d1ec920aa030a..8ac10e3960508 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/inode.c
@@ -264,11 +264,6 @@ int jfs_get_block(struct inode *ip, sector_t lblock,
return rc;
}
-static int jfs_writepage(struct page *page, struct writeback_control *wbc)
-{
- return block_write_full_page(page, jfs_get_block, wbc);
-}
-
static int jfs_writepages(struct address_space *mapping,
struct writeback_control *wbc)
{
@@ -355,12 +350,12 @@ const struct address_space_operations jfs_aops = {
.invalidate_folio = block_invalidate_folio,
.read_folio = jfs_read_folio,
.readahead = jfs_readahead,
- .writepage = jfs_writepage,
.writepages = jfs_writepages,
.write_begin = jfs_write_begin,
.write_end = jfs_write_end,
.bmap = jfs_bmap,
.direct_IO = jfs_direct_IO,
+ .migrate_folio = buffer_migrate_folio,
};
/*
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists