[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20221208154007.xlqdib25finzyyt6@quack3>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2022 16:40:07 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/13] ext4: Remove ordered data support from
ext4_writepage()
On Thu 08-12-22 09:23:56, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2022 at 12:27:16PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > ext4_writepage() should not be called for ordered data anymore. Remove
> > support for it from the function.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
>
> This commit (determined via bisection) is causing a large number of
> test failures for ext4/data_journal case:
>
> ext4/data_journal: 521 tests, 33 failures, 98 skipped, 4248 seconds
> Failures: ext4/004 generic/012 generic/016 generic/021 generic/022
> generic/029 generic/030 generic/031 generic/032 generic/058
> generic/060 generic/061 generic/063 generic/071 generic/075
> generic/098 generic/112 generic/127 generic/231 generic/393
> generic/397 generic/404 generic/439 generic/455 generic/477
> generic/491 generic/567 generic/572 generic/574 generic/577
> generic/634 generic/639 generic/679
>
> Many/most of these failures appear to be data plane failures. For
> example ext4/004 is a "dump | restore" followed by a "diff -r
> $DUMP_DIR $RESTORE_DIR". The generic/012, generic/021, generic/022
> failures are md5sum checksum failures after testing the punch hole
> operation. The generic/029 failure are hexdump mismatches after
> calling a combination of truncate, pwrites, and mmap'ed writes, etc.
>
> Since this is the last patch in the series, and we've already dropped
> the writepage hook (which is one of the things Christoph was going
> for), so one approach might be drop this patch from the series at
> least for this upcoming merge window.
>
> Jan, what do you think?
Yes, please drop it and I'm sorry for the breakage. I did only very limited
testing with data=journal mode (which passed) and apparently something
unexpected breaks. I suspect some path doing writeout of committed (but not
yet checkpointed) data pages breaks. I'll have a look.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists