linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Clean up the case-insensitive lookup path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <871qp8n0xy.fsf@suse.de>
Date:   Fri, 09 Dec 2022 10:47:37 -0300
From:   Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@...sman.be>
To:     Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc:     tytso@....edu, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/8] Clean up the case-insensitive lookup path

Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com> writes:

> On 10/14/22 4:45 AM, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>> Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com> writes:
>> 
>>> Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 07:41:42PM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm resubmitting this as v9 since I think it has fallen through the
>>>>> cracks :).  It is a collection of trivial fixes for casefold support on
>>>>> ext4/f2fs. More details below.
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been sitting on the list for a while and most of it is r-b
>>>>> already. I'm keeping the tags for this submission, since there is no
>>>>> modifications from previous submissions, apart from a minor conflict
>>>>> resolution when merging to linus/master.
>>>>
>>>> Who are you expecting to apply this?
>>>
>>> Hi Eric,
>>>
>>> There are three groups of changes here: libfs, ext4 and f2fs.  Since the
>>> changes in libfs are self-contained and only affect these two
>>> filesystems, I think it should be fine for them to go through a fs tree.
>>>
>>> The bulk of changes are ext4, and Ted mentioned on an earlier version
>>> that he could pick the first patches of this series, so I'm thinking it
>>> should all go through the ext4 tree.  If Jaegeuk acks, the f2fs changes
>>> are safe to go with the rest, or I can send them afterwards as a
>>> separate series once the libfs code is merged.
>> 
>> Ted,
>> 
>> Does the above plan work for you? Do you intend to pick this up for the
>> next merge window?
> It seems like this series hasn't been picked up. Any ideas on what can
> be done?

I got tired of the radio silence and gave up on it.  If there is interest,
feel free to respin it once more.

-- 
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi