linux-ext4 - Re: [syzbot] [ext4?] kernel panic: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic forced after error (2)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANp29Y7yH6LeeHMX-joXgr7duZzs2p3j08qZzS6WGwBJDDq+PA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Jan 2023 12:22:53 +0100
From:   Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
To:     "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+3c45794f522ad93b0eb6@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, llvm@...ts.linux.dev,
        nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, trix@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [ext4?] kernel panic: EXT4-fs (device loop0): panic
 forced after error (2)

Hi Ted,

Syzkaller already tries to avoid such situations, but in this
particular case, it has corrupted the mount options[1] and did not
recognize the problem. Though, as I understand, this string was
nevertheless valid to the kernel. Otherwise it would have aborted the
mount early (?).

I've sent a PR that should make the syzkaller logic more robust to
such broken options strings:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/pull/3604

[1] grpjquota=Jnoinit_itable(errors=remount-ro,minixdf,jqfmt=vfsv0,usrjquota=."

--
Aleksandr

On Thu, Dec 29, 2022 at 12:14 AM Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> So this is a totally bogus Syzbot report.  If you use the mount option
> "errors=panic", and you feed ext4 a corrupted file system, then it
> *will* issue an "Ext4-fs error" message, and if you tell it to panic,
> it will panic.
>
> So *please* let's not have some crazy Red Hat principal engineer try
> to file this as a high severity CVE....
>
> This is Working As Intended.  And it is Not A Bug.
>
>                                         - Ted
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/Y6zN/Q3glUcbty%2Bc%40mit.edu.