linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fail ext4_iget if special inode unallocated

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <eb59bd16-d97a-836b-691d-0d72106eccde@huawei.com>
Date:   Sat, 7 Jan 2023 09:37:53 +0800
From:   Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
To:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC:     <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <tytso@....edu>,
        <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fail ext4_iget if special inode unallocated

On 2023/1/6 22:28, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 06-01-23 18:47:05, Baokun Li wrote:
>> In ext4_fill_super(), EXT4_ORPHAN_FS flag is cleared after
>> ext4_orphan_cleanup() is executed. Therefore, when __ext4_iget() is
>> called to get an inode whose i_nlink is 0 when the flag exists, no error
>> is returned. If the inode is a special inode, a null pointer dereference
>> may occur. If the value of i_nlink is 0 for any inodes (except boot loader
>> inodes) got by using the EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL flag, the current file system
>> is corrupted. Therefore, make the ext4_iget() function return an error if
>> it gets such an abnormal special inode.
>>
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199179
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216541
>> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216539
>> Reported-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
>> Suggested-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
>> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> Thanks for the patch! A few comments below.
>
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> index 9d9f414f99fe..3f7cfa91ba89 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
>> @@ -4872,13 +4872,6 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
>>   		goto bad_inode;
>>   	raw_inode = ext4_raw_inode(&iloc);
>>   
>> -	if ((ino == EXT4_ROOT_INO) && (raw_inode->i_links_count == 0)) {
>> -		ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
>> -				 "iget: root inode unallocated");
>> -		ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
>> -		goto bad_inode;
>> -	}
>> -
>>   	if ((flags & EXT4_IGET_HANDLE) &&
>>   	    (raw_inode->i_links_count == 0) && (raw_inode->i_mode == 0)) {
>>   		ret = -ESTALE;
>> @@ -4951,10 +4944,13 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
>>   	 * NeilBrown 1999oct15
>>   	 */
>>   	if (inode->i_nlink == 0) {
>> -		if ((inode->i_mode == 0 ||
>> +		if ((inode->i_mode == 0 || (flags & EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL) ||
> 					   ^ extra parenthesis here  ^
Indeed, I'll remove the extra parenthesis.
>>   		     !(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ORPHAN_FS)) &&
>>   		    ino != EXT4_BOOT_LOADER_INO) {
>>   			/* this inode is deleted */
>> +			if (flags & EXT4_IGET_SPECIAL)
>> +				ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
>> +						 "iget: special inode unallocated");
> I think it would be better to return -EFSCORRUPTED and not -ESTALE in this
> case.
Totally agree! For special inode, -EFSCORRUPTED is more reasonable.
>>   			ret = -ESTALE;
>>   			goto bad_inode;
>>   		}
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me.
>
> 									Honza
>
Thank you very much for your review！
I will send a patch V2 with the changes suggested by you.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Baokun Li
.