[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230110133407.994711-2-zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 21:34:06 +0800
From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
To: <tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<linfeilong@...wei.com>, <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>,
zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ext4: fix inode tree inconsistency caused by ENOMEM in ext4_split_extent_at
If ENOMEM fails when the extent is splitting, we need to restore the length
of the split extent.
In the call stack of the ext4_split_extent_at function, only in
ext4_ext_create_new_leaf will it alloc memory and change the shape of the
extent tree,even if an ENOMEM is returned at this time, the extent tree is
still self-consistent, Just restore the split extent lens in the function
ext4_split_extent_at.
ext4_split_extent_at
ext4_ext_insert_extent
ext4_ext_create_new_leaf
1)ext4_ext_split
ext4_find_extent
2)ext4_ext_grow_indepth
ext4_find_extent
Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 9de1c9d1a13d..3559ea6b0781 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -3251,7 +3251,7 @@ static int ext4_split_extent_at(handle_t *handle,
ext4_ext_mark_unwritten(ex2);
err = ext4_ext_insert_extent(handle, inode, ppath, &newex, flags);
- if (err != -ENOSPC && err != -EDQUOT)
+ if (err != -ENOSPC && err != -EDQUOT && err != -ENOMEM)
goto out;
if (EXT4_EXT_MAY_ZEROOUT & split_flag) {
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists