[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202301120930.PwzivADh-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 10:07:14 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] ext4: Mark page for delayed dirtying only if it is
pinned
Hi Jan,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on tytso-ext4/dev]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.2-rc3 next-20230111]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jan-Kara/ext4-Update-stale-comment-about-write-constraints/20230111-234837
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4.git dev
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230111154338.392-3-jack%40suse.cz
patch subject: [PATCH 3/7] ext4: Mark page for delayed dirtying only if it is pinned
config: i386-randconfig-a013
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/d96cf5a515c2cfae084227d197c80e53683c1cf8
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jan-Kara/ext4-Update-stale-comment-about-write-constraints/20230111-234837
git checkout d96cf5a515c2cfae084227d197c80e53683c1cf8
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> fs/ext4/inode.c:3691:6: error: implicit declaration of function 'folio_may_be_dma_pinned' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (folio_may_be_dma_pinned(folio))
^
fs/ext4/inode.c:3691:6: note: did you mean 'folio_maybe_dma_pinned'?
include/linux/mm.h:1562:20: note: 'folio_maybe_dma_pinned' declared here
static inline bool folio_maybe_dma_pinned(struct folio *folio)
^
1 error generated.
vim +/folio_may_be_dma_pinned +3691 fs/ext4/inode.c
3671
3672 /*
3673 * For data=journal mode, folio should be marked dirty only when it was
3674 * writeably mapped. When that happens, it was already attached to the
3675 * transaction and marked as jbddirty (we take care of this in
3676 * ext4_page_mkwrite()). On transaction commit, we writeprotect page mappings
3677 * so we should have nothing to do here, except for the case when someone
3678 * had the page pinned and dirtied the page through this pin (e.g. by doing
3679 * direct IO to it). In that case we'd need to attach buffers here to the
3680 * transaction but we cannot due to lock ordering. We cannot just dirty the
3681 * folio and leave attached buffers clean, because the buffers' dirty state is
3682 * "definitive". We cannot just set the buffers dirty or jbddirty because all
3683 * the journalling code will explode. So what we do is to mark the folio
3684 * "pending dirty" and next time ext4_writepages() is called, attach buffers
3685 * to the transaction appropriately.
3686 */
3687 static bool ext4_journalled_dirty_folio(struct address_space *mapping,
3688 struct folio *folio)
3689 {
3690 WARN_ON_ONCE(!folio_buffers(folio));
> 3691 if (folio_may_be_dma_pinned(folio))
3692 folio_set_checked(folio);
3693 return filemap_dirty_folio(mapping, folio);
3694 }
3695
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
View attachment "config" of type "text/plain" (155996 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists