[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Y8QxYjy+4Kjg05rB@magnolia>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2023 09:01:22 -0800
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [RFC v6 04/10] iomap: Add iomap_get_folio helper
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 01:34:16PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:46:45AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 01:46:42PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > > We can handle that by adding a new IOMAP_NOCREATE iterator flag and
> > > checking for that in iomap_get_folio(). Your patch then turns into
> > > the below.
> >
> > Exactly. And as I already pointed out in reply to Dave's original
> > patch what we really should be doing is returning an ERR_PTR from
> > __filemap_get_folio instead of reverse-engineering the expected
> > error code.
>
> Ouch, we have a nasty problem.
>
> If somebody passes FGP_ENTRY, we can return a shadow entry. And the
> encodings for shadow entries overlap with the encodings for ERR_PTR,
> meaning that some shadow entries will look like errors. The way I
> solved this in the XArray code is by shifting the error values by
> two bits and encoding errors as XA_ERROR(-ENOMEM) (for example).
>
> I don't _object_ to introducing XA_ERROR() / xa_err() into the VFS,
> but so far we haven't, and I'd like to make that decision intentionally.
Sorry, I'm not following this at all -- where in buffered-io.c does
anyone pass FGP_ENTRY? Andreas' code doesn't seem to introduce it
either...?
--D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists