[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230123191813.GA16510@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2023 20:18:13 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nilfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: return an ERR_PTR from __filemap_get_folio v2
On Mon, Jan 23, 2023 at 10:59:45AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 22 Jan 2023 08:20:06 +0100 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 21, 2023 at 05:06:41PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > This patchset doesn't apply to fs/btrfs/ because linux-next contains
> > > this 6+ month-old commit:
> >
> > Hmm. It was literally written against linux-next as of last morning,
> > which does not have that commit.
>
> Confused. According to
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c#n4023
>
> it's there today. wait_dev_supers() has been foliofied.
Yes, it's there now. But I'm pretty sure it wasn't there when
I did the last rebase. Weird.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists