| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <e320e13e0f966b8878f923b3a700568064dbe634.1674822311.git.ojaswin@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 18:07:32 +0530
From: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC 05/11] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter
This gives better visibility into the number of extents scanned in each
particular CR. For example, this information can be used to see how out
block group scanning logic is performing when the BG is fragmented.
Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
---
fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 6037b8e0af86..4ba2c95915eb 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
atomic_t s_bal_success; /* we found long enough chunks */
atomic_t s_bal_allocated; /* in blocks */
atomic_t s_bal_ex_scanned; /* total extents scanned */
+ atomic_t s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS]; /* total extents scanned */
atomic_t s_bal_groups_scanned; /* number of groups scanned */
atomic_t s_bal_goals; /* goal hits */
atomic_t s_bal_breaks; /* too long searches */
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
index 323604a2ff45..07a50a13751c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
@@ -2077,6 +2077,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_measure_extent(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
BUG_ON(ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_CONTINUE);
ac->ac_found++;
+ ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
/*
* The special case - take what you catch first
@@ -2249,6 +2250,7 @@ void ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
break;
}
ac->ac_found++;
+ ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 1 << i;
ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = k << i;
@@ -2362,6 +2364,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
max = mb_find_extent(e4b, i, sbi->s_stripe, &ex);
if (max >= sbi->s_stripe) {
ac->ac_found++;
+ ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
ex.fe_logical = 0xDEADF00D; /* debug value */
ac->ac_b_ex = ex;
ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b);
@@ -2894,6 +2897,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR0]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR0]));
+ seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR0]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR0]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
@@ -2903,6 +2907,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR1]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR1]));
+ seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR1]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR1]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
@@ -2912,6 +2917,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR2]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR2]));
+ seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR2]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR2]));
@@ -2919,6 +2925,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR3]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR3]));
+ seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR3]));
seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR3]));
seq_printf(seq, "\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_ex_scanned));
@@ -4216,7 +4223,12 @@ static void ext4_mb_collect_stats(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
atomic_add(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len, &sbi->s_bal_allocated);
if (ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len >= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len)
atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_success);
+
atomic_add(ac->ac_found, &sbi->s_bal_ex_scanned);
+ for (int i=0; i<EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS; i++) {
+ atomic_add(ac->ac_cX_found[i], &sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[i]);
+ }
+
atomic_add(ac->ac_groups_scanned, &sbi->s_bal_groups_scanned);
if (ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start &&
ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
index f0087a85e366..004b8d163cc9 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context {
__u16 ac_groups_scanned;
__u16 ac_groups_linear_remaining;
__u16 ac_found;
+ __u16 ac_cX_found[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS];
__u16 ac_tail;
__u16 ac_buddy;
__u8 ac_status;
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists