[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202301291601.7591xziv-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2023 16:56:55 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Byungchul Park <max.byungchul.park@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, will@...nel.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org, joel@...lfernandes.org,
sashal@...nel.org, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, duyuyang@...il.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, tj@...nel.org, tytso@....edu,
willy@...radead.org, david@...morbit.com, amir73il@...il.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, kernel-team@....com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...nel.org,
minchan@...nel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
sj@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 05/25] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
Hi Byungchul,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/locking/core]
[also build test WARNING on tip/sched/core drm-misc/drm-misc-next linus/master v6.2-rc5]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Byungchul-Park/llist-Move-llist_-head-node-definition-to-types-h/20230128-102456
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1674782358-25542-6-git-send-email-max.byungchul.park%40gmail.com
patch subject: [PATCH v8 05/25] dept: Tie to Lockdep and IRQ tracing
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230129/202301291601.7591xziv-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-8) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/aed5169e3b6767146ee602447fcf75b4c734d2db
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Byungchul-Park/llist-Move-llist_-head-node-definition-to-types-h/20230128-102456
git checkout aed5169e3b6767146ee602447fcf75b4c734d2db
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
make W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/ drivers/platform/chrome/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c: In function 'cros_ec_proto_test_get_sensor_count_xfer_error':
>> drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c:2528:1: warning: the frame size of 2072 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
2528 | }
| ^
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c: In function 'cros_ec_proto_test_get_sensor_count_normal':
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c:2488:1: warning: the frame size of 2072 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
2488 | }
| ^
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c: In function 'cros_ec_proto_test_get_sensor_count_legacy':
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c:2593:1: warning: the frame size of 2136 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
2593 | }
| ^
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c: In function 'cros_ec_proto_test_check_features_not_cached':
drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c:2443:1: warning: the frame size of 2056 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
2443 | }
| ^
--
In file included from drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api.c:2882:
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c: In function 'vcap_api_next_lookup_advanced_test':
>> drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/vcap/vcap_api_kunit.c:1955:1: warning: the frame size of 2240 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
1955 | }
| ^
vim +2528 drivers/platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto_test.c
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2489
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2490 static void cros_ec_proto_test_get_sensor_count_xfer_error(struct kunit *test)
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2491 {
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2492 struct cros_ec_proto_test_priv *priv = test->priv;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2493 struct cros_ec_device *ec_dev = &priv->ec_dev;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2494 struct ec_xfer_mock *mock;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2495 int ret;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2496 struct cros_ec_dev ec;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2497
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2498 ec_dev->max_request = 0xff;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2499 ec_dev->max_response = 0xee;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2500 ec.ec_dev = ec_dev;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2501 ec.dev = ec_dev->dev;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2502 ec.cmd_offset = 0;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2503
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2504 /* For EC_CMD_MOTION_SENSE_CMD. */
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2505 {
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2506 mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_addx(test, -EPROTO, EC_RES_SUCCESS, 0);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2507 KUNIT_ASSERT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2508 }
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2509
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2510 ret = cros_ec_get_sensor_count(&ec);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2511 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ret, -EPROTO);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2512
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2513 /* For EC_CMD_MOTION_SENSE_CMD. */
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2514 {
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2515 struct ec_params_motion_sense *data;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2516
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2517 mock = cros_kunit_ec_xfer_mock_next();
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2518 KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_NE(test, mock, NULL);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2519
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2520 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.version, 1);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2521 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.command, EC_CMD_MOTION_SENSE_CMD);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2522 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.insize, sizeof(struct ec_response_motion_sense));
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2523 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, mock->msg.outsize, sizeof(*data));
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2524
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2525 data = (struct ec_params_motion_sense *)mock->i_data;
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2526 KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, data->cmd, MOTIONSENSE_CMD_DUMP);
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2527 }
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 @2528 }
33f0fdba6066b5 Tzung-Bi Shih 2022-06-22 2529
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
Powered by blists - more mailing lists