[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230207064203.72102-1-hanjinke.666@bytedance.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 14:42:03 +0800
From: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: jack@...e.cz, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: make dioread_nolock consistent in each mapping round
From: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
When disable and enable dioread_nolock by remount, we may see
dioread_lock in ext4_do_writepages while see dioread_nolock in
mpage_map_one_extent. This inconsistency may triger the warning
in ext4_release_io_end. Although this warning is harmless, we'd
better fix it
Signed-off-by: Jinke Han <hanjinke.666@...edance.com>
---
fs/ext4/inode.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 40579ef513b7..122a22ccddb3 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -1568,6 +1568,7 @@ struct mpage_da_data {
struct ext4_io_submit io_submit; /* IO submission data */
unsigned int do_map:1;
unsigned int scanned_until_end:1;
+ unsigned int dioread_nolock:1;
};
static void mpage_release_unused_pages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd,
@@ -2391,7 +2392,7 @@ static int mpage_map_one_extent(handle_t *handle, struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
struct inode *inode = mpd->inode;
struct ext4_map_blocks *map = &mpd->map;
int get_blocks_flags;
- int err, dioread_nolock;
+ int err, dioread_nolock = mpd->dioread_nolock;
trace_ext4_da_write_pages_extent(inode, map);
/*
@@ -2412,7 +2413,6 @@ static int mpage_map_one_extent(handle_t *handle, struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
get_blocks_flags = EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_CREATE |
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_METADATA_NOFAIL |
EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_SUBMIT;
- dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode);
if (dioread_nolock)
get_blocks_flags |= EXT4_GET_BLOCKS_IO_CREATE_EXT;
if (map->m_flags & BIT(BH_Delay))
@@ -2727,10 +2727,11 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
handle_t *handle = NULL;
struct inode *inode = mpd->inode;
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
- int needed_blocks, rsv_blocks = 0, ret = 0;
+ int needed_blocks, rsv_blocks = 0, rsv = 0, ret = 0;
struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(mapping->host->i_sb);
struct blk_plug plug;
bool give_up_on_write = false;
+ bool dioread_nolock;
trace_ext4_writepages(inode, wbc);
@@ -2783,15 +2784,6 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
ext4_journal_stop(handle);
}
- if (ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode)) {
- /*
- * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
- * the page and we may dirty the inode.
- */
- rsv_blocks = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
- PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
- }
-
if (wbc->range_start == 0 && wbc->range_end == LLONG_MAX)
range_whole = 1;
@@ -2837,6 +2829,18 @@ static int ext4_do_writepages(struct mpage_da_data *mpd)
goto unplug;
while (!mpd->scanned_until_end && wbc->nr_to_write > 0) {
+ dioread_nolock = ext4_should_dioread_nolock(inode);
+ if (!rsv && dioread_nolock) {
+ /*
+ * We may need to convert up to one extent per block in
+ * the page and we may dirty the inode.
+ */
+ rsv = 1 + ext4_chunk_trans_blocks(inode,
+ PAGE_SIZE >> inode->i_blkbits);
+ }
+ rsv_blocks = dioread_nolock ? rsv : 0;
+ mpd->dioread_nolock = dioread_nolock;
+
/* For each extent of pages we use new io_end */
mpd->io_submit.io_end = ext4_init_io_end(inode, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!mpd->io_submit.io_end) {
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists