[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230213080514.535568-3-zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 16:05:14 +0800
From: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
To: <tytso@....edu>, <jack@...e.com>
CC: <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<linfeilong@...wei.com>, <liuzhiqiang26@...wei.com>,
zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] ext4: clear the verified flag of the modified leaf or idx if error
Clear the verified flag from the modified bh when failed in ext4_ext_rm_idx
or ext4_ext_correct_indexes.
In this way, the start value of the logical block itself and its
parents' will be checked in ext4_valid_extent_entries.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@...wei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302131414.5RKeHgAZ-lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202302131407.XrieHNuN-lkp@intel.com/
---
fs/ext4/extents.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c
index 0f95e857089e..bbf34679e10c 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c
@@ -1756,6 +1756,8 @@ static int ext4_ext_correct_indexes(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (err)
break;
}
+ while (!(k < 0) && k++ < depth)
+ clear_buffer_verified(path[k].p_bh);
return err;
}
@@ -2304,6 +2306,7 @@ static int ext4_ext_rm_idx(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
{
int err;
ext4_fsblk_t leaf;
+ int b_depth = depth;
/* free index block */
depth--;
@@ -2345,6 +2348,9 @@ static int ext4_ext_rm_idx(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
if (err)
break;
}
+ while (!(depth < 0) && depth++ < b_depth - 1)
+ clear_buffer_verified(path[depth].p_bh);
+
return err;
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists