lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Feb 2023 00:10:42 +0800
From:   hanjinke <>
To:     "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <>,,
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v2] ext4: make dioread_nolock consistent in
 each mapping round

在 2023/2/16 下午9:13, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) 写道:
> Jinke Han <> writes:
>> From: Jinke Han <>
>> When disable and enable dioread_nolock by remount, we may see
>> dioread_lock in ext4_do_writepages while see dioread_nolock in
>> mpage_map_one_extent. This inconsistency may triger the warning
>> in ext4_add_complete_io when the io_end->handle is NULL. Although
>> this warning is harmless in most cases, there is still a risk of
>> insufficient log reservation in conversion of unwritten extents.
> Sorry, I haven't completely gone through the patch yet. But this idea of
> caching the initial value of mount parameter and passing it do different
> functions while an I/O request completes, is not looking right to me.
> If that's the case shouldn't we disallow this mount option to change
> until all the outstanding I/O's are done or complete?
> Then we need not cache the value of dioread_nolock at the start of
> writepages and continue to pass it down in case it it changes.
> Just my initial thoughts.
> -ritesh

Fair enough, thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists