[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230221115919.1918161-3-shikemeng@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 19:59:14 +0800
From: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
To: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] ext4: correct validation check of inode table in ext4_valid_block_bitmap
1.Last valid cluster of inode table is EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset +
sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1). We should make sure last valid cluster is <
max_bit, i.e., EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) is <
max_bit rather than EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) is
< max_bit.
2.Bit search length should be last valid cluster plus 1, i.e.,
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) + 1 rather than
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group).
Signed-off-by: Kemeng Shi <shikemeng@...weicloud.com>
---
fs/ext4/balloc.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/balloc.c b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
index 10cab743e313..22be5cd70505 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/balloc.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/balloc.c
@@ -350,13 +350,13 @@ static ext4_fsblk_t ext4_valid_block_bitmap(struct super_block *sb,
blk = ext4_inode_table(sb, desc);
offset = blk - group_first_block;
if (offset < 0 || EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset) >= max_bit ||
- EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group) >= max_bit)
+ EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) >= max_bit)
return blk;
next_zero_bit = ext4_find_next_zero_bit(bh->b_data,
- EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group),
+ EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) + 1,
EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset));
if (next_zero_bit <
- EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group))
+ EXT4_B2C(sbi, offset + sbi->s_itb_per_group - 1) + 1)
/* bad bitmap for inode tables */
return blk;
return 0;
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists