lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 22 Feb 2023 13:12:09 +0000
From:   Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To:     tytso@....edu, darrick.wong@...cle.com, djwong@...nel.org,
        adilger.kernel@...ger.ca
Cc:     linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        joneslee@...gle.com, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+6be2b977c89f79b6b153@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] ext4: fsmap: Fix crash caused by poor key validation

The following crash was seen on a 1k-block ext4 filesystem when the user
passed a fmr_physical of value zero for the high key:

kernel BUG at fs/ext4/ext4.h:3354!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 0 PID: 422 Comm: syz-executor339 Not tainted 5.15.74-syzkaller-00001-g4ec71a9ec769 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
RIP: 0010:ext4_get_group_info fs/ext4/ext4.h:3354 [inline]
RIP: 0010:ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp+0xe9d/0xeb0 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1498
Code: 99 ed c1 ff e9 47 f4 ff ff e8 5f a0 7f ff 48 c7 c7 c0 c3 a9 86 48 89 de 4c 89 ea e8 ad 8e 92 00 e9 a1 f2 ff ff e8 43 a0 7f ff <0f> 0b e8 3c a0 7f ff 0f 0b e8 35 a0 7f ff 0f 0b 0f 1f 00 55 48 89
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000044f320 EFLAGS: 00010293
RAX: ffffffff81f1f14d RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888106194f00
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000001
RBP: ffffc9000044f3b0 R08: ffffffff81f1e3a4 R09: ffffc9000044f440
R10: fffff52000089e8f R11: 1ffff92000089e88 R12: ffff888100a553c8
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: ffff888105f9a000
FS:  000055555675b300(0000) GS:ffff8881f7000000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000055c4f7cde3e8 CR3: 000000011c064000 CR4: 00000000003506b0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 ext4_mb_load_buddy fs/ext4/mballoc.c:1620 [inline]
 ext4_mballoc_query_range+0xb8/0x7b0 fs/ext4/mballoc.c:6560
 ext4_getfsmap_datadev+0x1c8a/0x28c0 fs/ext4/fsmap.c:537
 ext4_getfsmap+0xcff/0x1040 fs/ext4/fsmap.c:708
 ext4_ioc_getfsmap fs/ext4/ioctl.c:660 [inline]
 __ext4_ioctl fs/ext4/ioctl.c:862 [inline]
 ext4_ioctl+0x3020/0x50e0 fs/ext4/ioctl.c:1276
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl+0x115/0x190 fs/ioctl.c:860
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7b/0x90 fs/ioctl.c:860
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x44/0xd0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x61/0xcb
RIP: 0033:0x7f8d2372e3e9
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 14 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 c0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007ffcae7c2578 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00000000000f4240 RCX: 00007f8d2372e3e9
RDX: 0000000020000200 RSI: 00000000c0c0583b RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000000000000000d R09: 000000000000000d
R10: 00000000000003f1 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007f8d236ed5c0
R13: 00007ffcae7c25a0 R14: 00007ffcae7c258c R15: 00007ffcae7c2590

The crash is due to insufficient key validation.
When high_key->fmr_physical is zero for a 1k-block ext4 filesystem we
encounter an underflow in the second call to
ext4_get_group_no_and_offset():
	blocknr = blocknr - le32_to_cpu(es->s_first_data_block);
blocknr comes with value zero (high_key->fmr_physical is zero) and
the first_data_block is one, thus blocknr becomes -1. Since blocknr is
of type ext4_fsblk_t (unsigned long long) the value is all ones. Due to
the high values for blocknr and offset we hit the BUG_ON in
ext4_get_group_info() as the groupnr exceeds EXT4_SB(sb)->s_groups_count).

Fix it by returning early when keys[1].fmr_physical is less than or equal
to the first data block, as there's no data to return. This replicates the
behavior of returning zero, like in keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs. In both
cases -EINVAL could be returned but for some reason the author decided to
just ignore out of bounds requests.
One may notice that the check introduced addresses just the
ext4_getfsmap_datadev() handler. This is intentional, because for the
ext4_getfsmap_logdev() handler, the value of the high key passed by the
user is ignored and instead the code uses:
	memset(&info->gfi_high, 0xFF, sizeof(info->gfi_high));

Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 0c9ec4beecac ("ext4: support GETFSMAP ioctls")
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=79d5768e9bfe362911ac1a5057a36fc6b5c30002
Reported-by: syzbot+6be2b977c89f79b6b153@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
---
 fs/ext4/fsmap.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
index 4493ef0c715e..b5289378a761 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsmap.c
@@ -479,6 +479,8 @@ static int ext4_getfsmap_datadev(struct super_block *sb,
 	int error = 0;
 
 	bofs = le32_to_cpu(sbi->s_es->s_first_data_block);
+	if (keys[1].fmr_physical <= bofs)
+		return 0;
 	eofs = ext4_blocks_count(sbi->s_es);
 	if (keys[0].fmr_physical >= eofs)
 		return 0;
-- 
2.39.2.637.g21b0678d19-goog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists