linux-ext4 - Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] acl: drop posix acl handlers from xattr handlers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230306092633.tobpejvw7mwcx22v@wittgenstein>
Date:   Mon, 6 Mar 2023 10:26:33 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, reiserfs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] acl: drop posix acl handlers from xattr handlers

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:42:54PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 02:30:20PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This version looks good to me, but I'd really prefer if a reiserfs
> > insider could look over the reiserfs patches.
> 
> I consider this material for v6.4 even with an -rc8 for v6.3. So there's
> time but we shouldn't block it on reiserfs. Especially, since it's
> marked deprecated.

So I've applied this now. If there's still someone interested in
checking the reiserfs bits more than what we did with xfstests they
should please do so. But I don't want to hold up this series waiting for
that to happen.

> 
> Fwiw, I've tested reiserfs with xfstests on a kernel with and without
> this series applied and there's no regressions. But it's overall pretty
> buggy at least according to xfstests. Which is expected, I guess.