| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:14:19 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 05/11] ext4: Add per CR extent scanned counter
On Fri 27-01-23 18:07:32, Ojaswin Mujoo wrote:
> This gives better visibility into the number of extents scanned in each
> particular CR. For example, this information can be used to see how out
> block group scanning logic is performing when the BG is fragmented.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Looks good to me. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/ext4/ext4.h | 1 +
> fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> index 6037b8e0af86..4ba2c95915eb 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
> @@ -1633,6 +1633,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
> atomic_t s_bal_success; /* we found long enough chunks */
> atomic_t s_bal_allocated; /* in blocks */
> atomic_t s_bal_ex_scanned; /* total extents scanned */
> + atomic_t s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS]; /* total extents scanned */
> atomic_t s_bal_groups_scanned; /* number of groups scanned */
> atomic_t s_bal_goals; /* goal hits */
> atomic_t s_bal_breaks; /* too long searches */
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> index 323604a2ff45..07a50a13751c 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c
> @@ -2077,6 +2077,7 @@ static void ext4_mb_measure_extent(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> BUG_ON(ac->ac_status != AC_STATUS_CONTINUE);
>
> ac->ac_found++;
> + ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
>
> /*
> * The special case - take what you catch first
> @@ -2249,6 +2250,7 @@ void ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> break;
> }
> ac->ac_found++;
> + ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
>
> ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 1 << i;
> ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start = k << i;
> @@ -2362,6 +2364,7 @@ void ext4_mb_scan_aligned(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac,
> max = mb_find_extent(e4b, i, sbi->s_stripe, &ex);
> if (max >= sbi->s_stripe) {
> ac->ac_found++;
> + ac->ac_cX_found[ac->ac_criteria]++;
> ex.fe_logical = 0xDEADF00D; /* debug value */
> ac->ac_b_ex = ex;
> ext4_mb_use_best_found(ac, e4b);
> @@ -2894,6 +2897,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR0]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR0]));
> + seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR0]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR0]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
> @@ -2903,6 +2907,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR1]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR1]));
> + seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR1]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR1]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tbad_suggestions: %u\n",
> @@ -2912,6 +2917,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR2]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR2]));
> + seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR2]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR2]));
>
> @@ -2919,6 +2925,7 @@ int ext4_seq_mb_stats_show(struct seq_file *seq, void *offset)
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\thits: %llu\n", atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_hits[CR3]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tgroups_considered: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_groups_considered[CR3]));
> + seq_printf(seq, "\t\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[CR3]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\t\tuseless_loops: %llu\n",
> atomic64_read(&sbi->s_bal_cX_failed[CR3]));
> seq_printf(seq, "\textents_scanned: %u\n", atomic_read(&sbi->s_bal_ex_scanned));
> @@ -4216,7 +4223,12 @@ static void ext4_mb_collect_stats(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac)
> atomic_add(ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len, &sbi->s_bal_allocated);
> if (ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len >= ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len)
> atomic_inc(&sbi->s_bal_success);
> +
> atomic_add(ac->ac_found, &sbi->s_bal_ex_scanned);
> + for (int i=0; i<EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS; i++) {
> + atomic_add(ac->ac_cX_found[i], &sbi->s_bal_cX_ex_scanned[i]);
> + }
> +
> atomic_add(ac->ac_groups_scanned, &sbi->s_bal_groups_scanned);
> if (ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_start &&
> ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group == ac->ac_b_ex.fe_group)
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> index f0087a85e366..004b8d163cc9 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.h
> @@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ struct ext4_allocation_context {
> __u16 ac_groups_scanned;
> __u16 ac_groups_linear_remaining;
> __u16 ac_found;
> + __u16 ac_cX_found[EXT4_MB_NUM_CRS];
> __u16 ac_tail;
> __u16 ac_buddy;
> __u8 ac_status;
> --
> 2.31.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists