[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZArQ/WaBrw0LR56v@sol.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 22:41:01 -0800
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: convert to DIV_ROUND_UP() in
mpage_process_page_bufs()
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:27:38PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > Please don't do this. This makes the code compile down to a division, which is
> > far less efficient. I've verified this by checking the assembly generated.
>
> How much is the performance impact? So should the following be modified as shift operations as well?
>
> fs/erofs/namei.c:92: int head = 0, back = DIV_ROUND_UP(dir->i_size, EROFS_BLKSIZ) - 1;
> fs/erofs/zmap.c:252: const unsigned int totalidx = DIV_ROUND_UP(inode->i_size, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
> fs/erofs/decompressor.c:14:#define LZ4_MAX_DISTANCE_PAGES (DIV_ROUND_UP(LZ4_DISTANCE_MAX, PAGE_SIZE) + 1)
> fs/erofs/decompressor.c:56: DIV_ROUND_UP(distance, PAGE_SIZE) + 1 :
> fs/erofs/decompressor.c:70: unsigned long bounced[DIV_ROUND_UP(LZ4_MAX_DISTANCE_PAGES,
> fs/erofs/data.c:84: nblocks = DIV_ROUND_UP(inode->i_size, EROFS_BLKSIZ);
>
No, compilers can handle division by a power-of-2 constant just fine. It's just
division by a non-constant that is inefficient.
- Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists