[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230310232107.GE860405@mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2023 18:21:07 -0500
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>
Cc: adilger.kernel@...ger.ca, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: convert to DIV_ROUND_UP() in
mpage_process_page_bufs()
On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 02:07:34PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> Just for better readability, no code logic change.
All aside from the arguments over performance, I'm not at *all*
convinced by the "it's more readable" argument.
So yeah, let's not. We have i_blkbits for a reason, and it's because
shifting right is just simpler and easier.
BTW, doing a 64-bit division on a 32-bit platforms causes compile
failures, which was the cause of the test bot complaint:
ld: fs/ext4/inode.o: in function `mpage_process_page_bufs':
>> inode.c:(.text+0xbda): undefined reference to `__divdi3'
On 32-bit platforms --- i386 in particular --- the 64-bit division
results in an out-of-line call to a helper function that is not
supplied in the kernel compilation environment, so not only is it
slower, it Just Doesn't Work.
- Ted
Powered by blists - more mailing lists