linux-ext4 - [PATCH 5/8] ext4: rename two functions with 'check'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230323140517.1070239-6-yanaijie@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 22:05:14 +0800
From:   Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
To:     <tytso@....edu>, <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>, <jack@...e.cz>,
        <ritesh.list@...il.com>, <lczerner@...hat.com>,
        <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] ext4: rename two functions with 'check'

The naming styles are different for some functions with 'check' in their
names. Some of them are like:

ext4_check_quota_consistency
ext4_check_test_dummy_encryption
ext4_check_opt_consistency
ext4_check_descriptors
ext4_check_feature_compatibility

While the others looks like below:

ext4_geometry_check
ext4_journal_data_mode_check

This is not a big deal and boils down to personal preference. But I'd
like to make them consistent.

Signed-off-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@...wei.com>
---
 fs/ext4/super.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
index ed7bd3bb45f2..66f0da764d58 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
@@ -4713,7 +4713,7 @@ static int ext4_check_feature_compatibility(struct super_block *sb,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int ext4_geometry_check(struct super_block *sb,
+static int ext4_check_geometry(struct super_block *sb,
 			       struct ext4_super_block *es)
 {
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
@@ -4922,7 +4922,7 @@ static int ext4_load_and_init_journal(struct super_block *sb,
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static int ext4_journal_data_mode_check(struct super_block *sb)
+static int ext4_check_journal_data_mode(struct super_block *sb)
 {
 	if (test_opt(sb, DATA_FLAGS) == EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_DATA) {
 		printk_once(KERN_WARNING "EXT4-fs: Warning: mounting with "
@@ -5162,7 +5162,7 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 	if (ext4_encoding_init(sb, es))
 		goto failed_mount;
 
-	if (ext4_journal_data_mode_check(sb))
+	if (ext4_check_journal_data_mode(sb))
 		goto failed_mount;
 
 	sb->s_flags = (sb->s_flags & ~SB_POSIXACL) |
@@ -5264,7 +5264,7 @@ static int __ext4_fill_super(struct fs_context *fc, struct super_block *sb)
 		goto failed_mount;
 	}
 
-	if (ext4_geometry_check(sb, es))
+	if (ext4_check_geometry(sb, es))
 		goto failed_mount;
 
 	timer_setup(&sbi->s_err_report, print_daily_error_info, 0);
-- 
2.31.1