lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230330082146.muy4j4ehf3l7w3xi@quack3>
Date:   Thu, 30 Mar 2023 10:21:46 +0200
From:   Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Ted Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] ext4: Drop special handling of journalled data
 from ext4_sync_file()

On Wed 29-03-23 17:05:45, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2023 at 05:49:37PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> >  	/*
> > -	 * data=writeback,ordered:
> >  	 *  The caller's filemap_fdatawrite()/wait will sync the data.
> >  	 *  Metadata is in the journal, we wait for proper transaction to
> >  	 *  commit here.
> 
> Nit: without the list, the two space indent looks a bit weird here.
> 
> >  	if (!sbi->s_journal)
> >  		ret = ext4_fsync_nojournal(inode, datasync, &needs_barrier);
> > -	else if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
> > -		ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
> >  	else
> >  		ret = ext4_fsync_journal(inode, datasync, &needs_barrier);
> 
> Also if there is not journale the above comment doesn't make much sense.
> But I'm really not sure the comment adds any value to start with, so
> maybe just drop it entirely?

Hum, right. I'll just drop the whole comment. Thanks for the suggestion.

								Honza


-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ