lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230404233713.GF1893@sol.localdomain> Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 16:37:13 -0700 From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org> To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com> Cc: djwong@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, hch@...radead.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, fsverity@...ts.linux.dev, rpeterso@...hat.com, agruenba@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, jth@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/23] fs-verity support for XFS On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:52:56PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote: > The patchset is tested with xfstests -g auto on xfs_1k, xfs_4k, > xfs_1k_quota, and xfs_4k_quota. Haven't found any major failures. Just to double check, did you verify that the tests in the "verity" group are running, and were not skipped? - Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists