lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230405103642.ykmgjgb7yi7htphf@aalbersh.remote.csb> Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 12:36:42 +0200 From: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com> To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> Cc: djwong@...nel.org, dchinner@...hat.com, ebiggers@...nel.org, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, fsverity@...ts.linux.dev, rpeterso@...hat.com, agruenba@...hat.com, xiang@...nel.org, chao@...nel.org, damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, jth@...nel.org, linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/23] fsverity: make fsverity_verify_folio() accept folio's offset and size Hi Christoph, On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 08:30:36AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Apr 04, 2023 at 04:53:01PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote: > > Not the whole folio always need to be verified by fs-verity (e.g. > > with 1k blocks). Use passed folio's offset and size. > > Why can't those callers just call fsverity_verify_blocks directly? > They can. Calling _verify_folio with explicit offset; size appeared more clear to me. But I'm ok with dropping this patch to have full folio verify function. -- - Andrey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists