linux-ext4 - Re: [RFCv2 2/8] libfs: Add __generic_file_fsync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZDTvrmFR1/nXUqMl@infradead.org>
Date:   Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:27:10 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFCv2 2/8] libfs: Add __generic_file_fsync_nolock implementation

On Tue, Apr 11, 2023 at 10:51:50AM +0530, Ritesh Harjani (IBM) wrote:
> +/**
> + * __generic_file_fsync_nolock - generic fsync implementation for simple
> + * filesystems with no inode lock

No reallz need for the __ prefix in the name.

> +extern int __generic_file_fsync_nolock(struct file *, loff_t, loff_t, int);

No need for the extern.  And at least I personally prefer to spell out
the parameter names to make the prototype much more readable.