linux-ext4 - [RFCv3 03/10] ext4: Use __generic_file_fsync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <334f21c733db6a9a872e91d81af18e9286a88781.1681365596.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 13 Apr 2023 14:10:25 +0530
From:   "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
To:     linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Ojaswin Mujoo <ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Subject: [RFCv3 03/10] ext4: Use __generic_file_fsync_nolock implementation

ext4 when got converted to iomap for dio, it copied __generic_file_fsync
implementation to avoid taking inode_lock in order to avoid any deadlock
(since iomap takes an inode_lock while calling generic_write_sync()).

The previous patch already added it's _nolock variant. Hence kill the
redundant code and use __generic_file_fsync_nolock() function instead.

Tested-by: Disha Goel <disgoel@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@...il.com>
---
 fs/ext4/fsync.c | 31 +++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/fsync.c b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
index 027a7d7037a0..bf1d1b7f4ec7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/fsync.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/fsync.c
@@ -78,21 +78,13 @@ static int ext4_sync_parent(struct inode *inode)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int ext4_fsync_nojournal(struct inode *inode, bool datasync,
-				bool *needs_barrier)
+static int ext4_fsync_nojournal(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end,
+				int datasync, bool *needs_barrier)
 {
-	int ret, err;
-
-	ret = sync_mapping_buffers(inode->i_mapping);
-	if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_ALL))
-		return ret;
-	if (datasync && !(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY_DATASYNC))
-		return ret;
-
-	err = sync_inode_metadata(inode, 1);
-	if (!ret)
-		ret = err;
+	struct inode *inode = file->f_inode;
+	int ret;
 
+	ret = __generic_file_fsync_nolock(file, start, end, datasync);
 	if (!ret)
 		ret = ext4_sync_parent(inode);
 	if (test_opt(inode->i_sb, BARRIER))
@@ -148,6 +140,14 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
+	if (!sbi->s_journal) {
+		ret = ext4_fsync_nojournal(file, start, end, datasync,
+					   &needs_barrier);
+		if (needs_barrier)
+			goto issue_flush;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
 	ret = file_write_and_wait_range(file, start, end);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out;
@@ -166,13 +166,12 @@ int ext4_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
 	 *  (they were dirtied by commit).  But that's OK - the blocks are
 	 *  safe in-journal, which is all fsync() needs to ensure.
 	 */
-	if (!sbi->s_journal)
-		ret = ext4_fsync_nojournal(inode, datasync, &needs_barrier);
-	else if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
+	if (ext4_should_journal_data(inode))
 		ret = ext4_force_commit(inode->i_sb);
 	else
 		ret = ext4_fsync_journal(inode, datasync, &needs_barrier);
 
+issue_flush:
 	if (needs_barrier) {
 		err = blkdev_issue_flush(inode->i_sb->s_bdev);
 		if (!ret)
-- 
2.39.2