[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230419064610.1918038-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 06:46:07 +0000
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: tytso@....edu, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
joneslee@...gle.com, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH][for stable [4.14, 5.10] 0/3] ext4: fix use-after-free in ext4_xattr_set_entry
This is a good example that emphasizes that the order in which patches
are queued to stable matters. More details in the revert commit.
Tested and intended for 4.14, 4.19, 5.4, 5.10.
Baokun Li (1):
ext4: fix use-after-free in ext4_xattr_set_entry
Ritesh Harjani (1):
ext4: remove duplicate definition of ext4_xattr_ibody_inline_set()
Tudor Ambarus (1):
Revert "ext4: fix use-after-free in ext4_xattr_set_entry"
fs/ext4/inline.c | 11 +++++------
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 26 +-------------------------
fs/ext4/xattr.h | 6 +++---
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
--
2.40.0.634.g4ca3ef3211-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists